Scenario 1: A client has sent you an important communication on email.You clicked on the mail, found it too long, thought you will catch up on it later, and then conveniently forgot about it.The client assumes you are working on the feedback given in the mail, and promptly calls you at the appointed date, and you suddenly realize that you don’t have a clue what its all about. You don’t have an option but to just say “Let me get back to you on that”.

This is just one of the scenarios put forth in Omkar Sane’s rib tickling and equally thought provoking Coming Soon: The End.Sane takes on the Indian Television industry, and exposes it for the sham that it has now become. And he does so in a tongue-in-cheek fashion that will have you rolling in laughter.

This is the story of the Indian Television industry told through four friends, each of whom happens to work in different parts of the television circus-kids channel, music channel, general entertainment, and news. Through the stories of these friends, told to an equally enthusiastic listener, Sane explores the many pitfalls and shortcomings of the industry.

The book also speaks about some of the things which are applicable to the corporate world at large. The endless chain of emailers, where all we do is buy time and postpone making a decision, the penchant to adhere to processes while the work keeps on piling up,etc,etc.

Admittedly, Sane’s book takes a one-sided, slightly pessimistic view of the television industry, but one cannot deny the element of truth lying in those pages.

Popularity: 8% [?]

Recently, the WSJ put together two articles, with Clay Shirky arguing that for the former – saying that ‘amid the silly videos and spam are the roots of a new reading and writing culture.’  Nicholas Carr argues for the other side, saying that we are turning into ’shallow thinkers.’  Both articles were interesting; read more at:

Does the Internet make you Dumber?

and

Does the Internet make you Smarter?

It is a topic that we can argue endlessly about, but I’d like to  be optimistic on this, and that’s why maybe I am veering towards the former idea (smarter).  But Carr’s article is more scientifically written and it does have a lot of relevant points. And one of my pet peeves is that the younger generations, with their growing online interactions, are losing out on the rich complexity of face-to-face human interactions.

As with most questions of this type, the answer really is – it depends. Like fire, the Internet is a good servant but bad master.  It’s how we use it and what we use it for that determines the end result.  As long as we still use the skills and techniques that make us what we are – critical, cognitive thinking, ability to sort information and use it relevantly, ability to build on concepts to arrive at newer/better applications – then the Internet is just another layer in our learning process.

What is your take?

Popularity: 6% [?]

watch?v=J9_l9O1×284&feature=related

According to author and communications and influencing consultant Shelle Rose Charvet, they indeed can. Shelle is in Bangalore to conduct a 3 day work shop based on a book she wrote and the LAB (Language and Behavior) profile technique that she adopts in her workshops and consulting practice.

Based on the premise that you can influence behavior, and that you need to take charge of how effective you can be in any situation that involves communication, the workshop threw a lot of light on how to actively listen and interpret patterns of communication.

The technique has wide applicability, and if practiced diligently, can get us great results both at home and at work. At work, one can apply in any kind of interaction- employee, customer. One could use it to determine fit while hiring, or to find better ways to engage with customers.

I have been attending a workshop by Shelle with a colleague. Today is the third day and if the last 2 days are any indication, we are in for a fascinating day. It has been fun and at the same time highly insightful. Shelle ( not unsurprisingly) is a great communicator and very experienced too. Though this is her 1st trip to India, and perhaps her first formal engagement with an Indian audience, she has adapted to the context with ease.

I am looking forward to apply my learning both at work and at home.

Popularity: 8% [?]

Sramana Mitra, a Silicon Valley based strategy consultant and an erstwhile entrepreneur has written a 3 part series to give an overview of successful entrepreneurial experiences in the tech field. The books are a compilation of interviews of CEOs of a diverse set of companies interspersed with her own commentary. Through these interviews she discerns some patterns, underscores some points and brings out her own views on future trends in technology as well as what it takes to succeeds.

The books are interesting because 1. the style of compilations is like a set of short stories, so you can actually pick and choose what is most relevant 2. These are first hand accounts from the founders and hence gives rare insights on the entrepreneurial mindset, motivations and the journey itself 3. For me personally, I learned about a lot of companies that are not exactly household names, but are doing remarkable things.

I will write about a few such inspiring stories and more take aways in future posts.

Popularity: 8% [?]

I read a really interesting book recently by one of America’s greatest choreographers, Twyla Tharp, called the Creative Habit. Twyla draws from examples in her life that underscore the importance of doing things regularly and with passion to hone one’s creativity. Among the many takeaways, one that stood out for me for this:

” Who you are and what you become five years from now depends on the books you read and the people you meet.”

Being an avid reader myself, and having experienced the value of building relationships, I could relate so well to this observation.

Yes, we meet so many different people professionally and personally, and even if I kept in touch and built a longer term relationship with a fraction of those, we would have done our job. Remember, one also needs to reciprocate to nurture relationships, and hence I believe that one has to pick and choose a little in deciding the relationships you want to maintain.

One last point on this- in today’s context, the social media platforms, especially linked in and facebook, are great aids to nurturing relationships, provided you are willing to invest time regularly.

Popularity: 7% [?]

Here is an example that Gawande cites on the impact a simple checklist had in the ICU of Johns Hopkins Hospital in the US. A critical care specialist, Peter Pronovost, decided to use a checklist of one aspect of ICU management- controlling central line infections. It was a 5 step process. Provonost made the nurses the custodians of this process and they tracked how rigorously doctors followed the 5 steps. It turned out after a month that doctors skipped at least one step in a third of the cases. The nurses were now authorized to ensure that the doctors did not skip any step. A year later, the results were great- the ten-day line-infection rate, which they had sought to control reduced from 11% to 0%. In one hospital the checklist had prevented 43 infections, 8 deaths and saved $2M!

Spurred by the success, Provonost introduced checklists for other areas too with similar success. Gawande also adds that Provonost is no average joe- he is described by colleagues as brilliant, a genius. He has an MD & a PhD!

I will write about another example or insight in my next post on this.

Popularity: 7% [?]